iFANN
    ค้นหาใน iFANN...
    เข้าสู่ระบบ
    หน้าแรก
    ข่าว
    วิดีโอ
    รูปภาพ
    GIF
    สำรวจ
    โพล
    รางวัล
    iFAMOUS
    วิกิ
    อนิเมะ
    ห้อง
    การแจ้งเตือน
    ข้อความ
    ที่บันทึกไว้
    โปรไฟล์
    วิกิรางวัลiFAMOUSอันดับอุตสาหกรรมรางวัลครีเอเตอร์รางวัลผู้ใช้ข้อกำหนดความเป็นส่วนตัวหลักเกณฑ์ชุมชนแจ้งลบ / DMCAช่วยเหลือนักพัฒนา

    © 2026 iFANN

    หน้าแรก
    ค้นหา
    ข้อความ
    การแจ้งเตือน
    โปรไฟล์
    รูปภาพ
    Evira
    Evira@evira0mo
    🎤Daron Acemoğlu🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology💭Tech
    MIT Economists Tech Framework Chart

    @eviraMost tech isn't automatically good for workers. Three MIT economists D. Acemoglu, D. Autor, and S. Johnson outline a framework in their Brookings Institution paper Building Pro-Worker Artificial Intelligence showing that only task creating technologies are unambiguously pro worker. These tools raise demand for new forms of human expertise instead of making existing expertise less necessary. Their chart breaks down five categories: Labor-augmenting, Capital-augmenting, Automation, New task-creating, and Expertise-leveling to show how different technologies shape outcomes. That distinction changes how leaders should judge progress

    ดูโพสต์ต้นฉบับ

    MIT Economists Tech Framework Chart

    รูปภาพโดย @evira· Aug 24, 2026· Daron Acemoğlu

    เกี่ยวกับรูปนี้

    The image is a chart titled "Types of Technologies and Their Labor Market Consequences." It breaks down five categories of technologies: Labor-augmenting, Capital-augmenting, Automation, New task-creating, and Expertise-leveling. Each category is described with an example technology, its impact on labor productivity, value of human expertise, change in labor's share of national income, and whether it's pro-worker. The chart has a clean, academic aesthetic. A notable detail is the MIT Sloan School logo in the bottom right corner. The source is cited as D. Acemoglu, D. Autor, and S. Johnson, "Building Pro-Worker Artificial Intelligence" (Brookings Institution, 2026).

    ดูรูปภาพ Daron Acemoğlu ทั้งหมดอ่านวิกิ Daron Acemoğlu

    ?

    ยังไม่มีความคิดเห็น มาเป็นคนแรกกันเถอะ!

    รูปภาพ Daron Acemoğlu เพิ่มเติม

    ดูรูปภาพ Daron Acemoğlu ทั้งหมด
    IMF on AI and European productivityIMF on AI and European productivityVals revenue up 8x as AI benchmarking becomes a businessVals revenue up 8x as AI benchmarking becomes a businessSpirit AI humanoid robots 2027 predictionSpirit AI humanoid robots 2027 predictionAnthropic frontier model pause requestAnthropic frontier model pause requestNscale AI infrastructure financial resultsNscale AI infrastructure financial resultsAnthropic Is Building a Real Biology LabAnthropic Is Building a Real Biology LabOpenAI $280 billion burn projectionOpenAI $280 billion burn projectionGemini hacked three real companies in AI security testGemini hacked three real companies in AI security testOpenAI buys AI camera startupOpenAI buys AI camera startupAnthropic Claude wealth managementAnthropic Claude wealth managementGates Foundation $1 billion AI accessGates Foundation $1 billion AI accessLagarde on Europe AI dependenceLagarde on Europe AI dependenceChina calls AI slowdown a Cold War moveChina calls AI slowdown a Cold War moveAccenture AI tokenomics chartAccenture AI tokenomics chartJacob Coxon AI warningJacob Coxon AI warningGLP-1 drug impact on grocery spendingGLP-1 drug impact on grocery spendingGPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5 benchmark resultsGPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5 benchmark resultsSimon Deliver AI camouflage shirtSimon Deliver AI camouflage shirt
    รูปภาพ
    Evira
    Evira@evira0mo
    🎤Daron Acemoğlu🏛️MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology💭Tech
    MIT Economists Tech Framework Chart

    @eviraMost tech isn't automatically good for workers. Three MIT economists D. Acemoglu, D. Autor, and S. Johnson outline a framework in their Brookings Institution paper Building Pro-Worker Artificial Intelligence showing that only task creating technologies are unambiguously pro worker. These tools raise demand for new forms of human expertise instead of making existing expertise less necessary. Their chart breaks down five categories: Labor-augmenting, Capital-augmenting, Automation, New task-creating, and Expertise-leveling to show how different technologies shape outcomes. That distinction changes how leaders should judge progress

    ดูโพสต์ต้นฉบับ

    MIT Economists Tech Framework Chart

    รูปภาพโดย @evira· Aug 24, 2026· Daron Acemoğlu

    เกี่ยวกับรูปนี้

    The image is a chart titled "Types of Technologies and Their Labor Market Consequences." It breaks down five categories of technologies: Labor-augmenting, Capital-augmenting, Automation, New task-creating, and Expertise-leveling. Each category is described with an example technology, its impact on labor productivity, value of human expertise, change in labor's share of national income, and whether it's pro-worker. The chart has a clean, academic aesthetic. A notable detail is the MIT Sloan School logo in the bottom right corner. The source is cited as D. Acemoglu, D. Autor, and S. Johnson, "Building Pro-Worker Artificial Intelligence" (Brookings Institution, 2026).

    ดูรูปภาพ Daron Acemoğlu ทั้งหมดอ่านวิกิ Daron Acemoğlu

    ?

    ยังไม่มีความคิดเห็น มาเป็นคนแรกกันเถอะ!

    รูปภาพ Daron Acemoğlu เพิ่มเติม

    ดูรูปภาพ Daron Acemoğlu ทั้งหมด
    IMF on AI and European productivityIMF on AI and European productivityVals revenue up 8x as AI benchmarking becomes a businessVals revenue up 8x as AI benchmarking becomes a businessSpirit AI humanoid robots 2027 predictionSpirit AI humanoid robots 2027 predictionAnthropic frontier model pause requestAnthropic frontier model pause requestNscale AI infrastructure financial resultsNscale AI infrastructure financial resultsAnthropic Is Building a Real Biology LabAnthropic Is Building a Real Biology LabOpenAI $280 billion burn projectionOpenAI $280 billion burn projectionGemini hacked three real companies in AI security testGemini hacked three real companies in AI security testOpenAI buys AI camera startupOpenAI buys AI camera startupAnthropic Claude wealth managementAnthropic Claude wealth managementGates Foundation $1 billion AI accessGates Foundation $1 billion AI accessLagarde on Europe AI dependenceLagarde on Europe AI dependenceChina calls AI slowdown a Cold War moveChina calls AI slowdown a Cold War moveAccenture AI tokenomics chartAccenture AI tokenomics chartJacob Coxon AI warningJacob Coxon AI warningGLP-1 drug impact on grocery spendingGLP-1 drug impact on grocery spendingGPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5 benchmark resultsGPT-6 Astra vs Fable 5 benchmark resultsSimon Deliver AI camouflage shirtSimon Deliver AI camouflage shirt