@hype_castle27GLM 5.2 has surged on the Artificial Analysis Coding Index, jumping from 43.4 to 50.7 , a gain of seven points in a single release. According to bridgemindai, these results align with what they're observing on BridgeBench and in their own personal tests. With this update, GLM 5.2 is now outperforming Qwen 3.7 Max, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and Kimi.
ดูโพสต์ต้นฉบับรูปภาพโดย @hype_castle27· Jun 17, 2026· Claude
A horizontal bar chart titled Artificial Analysis Coding Index compares AI models on a weighted average of coding benchmarks. Two blue bars stand out with red boxes around them, one labeled Z under Owen3.7 Max scoring 50.7 and another Z model named GLM-5.1 at 43.4. A long red arrow points from right to left toward the first boxed blue bar. The linker's team logos appear beneath each bar with model names like Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5.4 mini, and Grok 4.3.
@hype_castle27GLM 5.2 has surged on the Artificial Analysis Coding Index, jumping from 43.4 to 50.7 , a gain of seven points in a single release. According to bridgemindai, these results align with what they're observing on BridgeBench and in their own personal tests. With this update, GLM 5.2 is now outperforming Qwen 3.7 Max, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and Kimi.
ดูโพสต์ต้นฉบับรูปภาพโดย @hype_castle27· Jun 17, 2026· Claude
A horizontal bar chart titled Artificial Analysis Coding Index compares AI models on a weighted average of coding benchmarks. Two blue bars stand out with red boxes around them, one labeled Z under Owen3.7 Max scoring 50.7 and another Z model named GLM-5.1 at 43.4. A long red arrow points from right to left toward the first boxed blue bar. The linker's team logos appear beneath each bar with model names like Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5.4 mini, and Grok 4.3.
